Action Plan
TOTAL Using Best Practices in Online Teaching Workshop
Current Situation
Classroom discussion is a major part of my on-site English 111 course, but I’ve struggled to successfully incorporate discussion board assignments into the online version of the course. Currently, I post a question related to a reading and require that students create an original post, and then respond to two of their classmates’ posts. The quality of the posts is less than I’d like to see; therefore, I need to make some changes to ensure adequate student participation and performance.
Desired Change
I will model my discussion board after the Asynchronous Discussion Forum (ADF) advocated by John Nash in his article “A Tale of Two Forums: One Professor’s Path to Improve Learning Through a Common Online Teaching Tool.” Nash uses a scaffolded approach in which students respond with initial reactions to the discussion question early in the week. In the middle of the week, they respond to two classmates’ posts which helps them gain further understanding of the required reading material. At the end of the week, each student writes a more developed 300 word response (187). Nash concludes his course by requiring that students write a 1250 word syntheses essay in which they select one week’s class discussion topic to explore in great detail (187). This model should work well for my English 111 course. It promotes the course content while fostering immediacy and interaction.
Plan Elements with Warrants
Elements
|
Warrants
|
Implement an Asynchronous Discussion Forum (ADF) which utilizes a scaffolded approach.
|
A scaffolded approach helps make sure that ADFs are effective for students (Nash 183). Using the scaffolded approach encourages autonomous learning (Linn 832).
|
Provide a discussion question for students at the beginning of the week, and ask that they post an initial response at the beginning of the week. Then, ask that students respond to two classmates by the middle of the week.
|
Instructors should create challenging assignments that foster interaction and dialogue (Dysthe 350).
|
Maintain a presence in the course by responding to students and providing feedback throughout the week.
|
Instructor presence could make a bigger difference with how a student perceives the class than the presence of fellow students (Swan and Shih 122).
|
At the end of the week, students will write a 300 word response based on their discussions throughout the week. At the end of the semester, students will write a fully developed 1200-1500 word essay that draws on one of their previous 300 word essays and the relevant discussions.
|
A synthesis essay allows the instructor to track the student’s line of thought while helping students combine different ideas addressed throughout the semester (Nash 191).
|
Works Cited
Dysthe, Olga. “The Learning Potential of a Web-mediated Discussion in a University Course. Studies in Higher Education 27.3 (2002): 339-352.
Linn, Marcia C. “Cognition and Distance Learning.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47.11 (1996): 826-842).
Nash, John. “A Tale of Two Forums: One Professor’s Path to Improve Learning Through a Common Online Teaching Tool.” Journal of Research on Leadership Education 6.5 (2011): 181-194.
Swan, Karen and Li Fang Shih. “On the Nature and Development of Social Presence in Online Course Discussions.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 9.3 (2005): 115-136).